In a recent blog post a comparison was made between ColdFusion and Railo.
http://www.cfmldeveloper.com/page.cfm/coldfusion-vs-railo-1
On episode 77 of CFHour.com podcast we discuss this post in detail. There is one overall thing on the post I did not agree with. That was the moderation of the comments. So, having said that, feel free to post your comments here. My blog is not moderated and you can feel free to speak your mind.
Till next time...
--Dave
#1 by Emmit on 11/5/10 - 3:41 PM
#2 by David Boyer on 11/5/10 - 5:09 PM
Railo is open source though, so you have the choice of paying for Railo support and getting it fixed that way, fix it yourself or prove that the bug is important enough to be prioritised (see the railo uservoice site). Remember that they have to make a living and focus on what their paying customers want (just like Adobe) fixed, then they'll see what issues are affecting most of the community.
Adobe aren't perfect either. Sometimes they'll seem to sit on bug reports for a while, even waiting until the next major version before looking into them. The main difference is Adobe doesn't have to be as open as Railo about it.
I like both of them. I use Adobe ColdFusion is my work place and love using Railo outside of work. All I wish is is that Adobe would be a bit more responsive to informing people what's happening with bugs they've logged and that Railo catch up on certain functionality (which I think 3.2 will).
#3 by spills on 11/5/10 - 5:56 PM
It's obvious you don't keep up with the current state of Railo development, as currently Railo 3.2 even in preview release is rock stable. What example do you have of Railo being buggy? The bugtracker imho is a little outdated on some issues, as quite of few them have been resolved but, not marked resolved. I have gone ACF free and have not looked back. ACF still relies on Jrun which for all intensive purposes is dead and needs to disappear. I can't remember how many times my CF server would mysteriously stop working because of memory management issues -- I don't have that with Railo.
#4 by Jeff Gladnick on 11/6/10 - 12:56 AM
Sure there were occasional inconsistencies, especially when porting over open source projects written for CF (sometimes with sloppy code that CF allowed to pass), but that sort of thing was caught and dealt with during development.
I think I have found one or two bugs over the 4 years I've been using Railo now, but its always been in production, and bug patches have come QUICKLY from the railo guys
#5 by Steve on 11/8/10 - 5:03 AM